policy division of Italy continues. Not only by the selfish interests, but also by municipal federalism. Many Italians have already understood, in fact, that the so-called''revolution''of the tax will hit the poorest and most disadvantaged regions, traders, workers.
Example number one: the Coupon dry.
born on the taxation of income from property rented. For the taxpayer to step IRPEF dry with coupon rate of 19 or 21 is optional, you can choose the solution. The discount potential tax due is more relevant for taxpayers with a higher total income and is indifferent to the lowest incomes, will continue to choose the personal income tax. Municipalities now receive about 11 billion transfers. Now instead of transfers, there are charges paid and partnerships. Among them the coupon. But in the evaluation of accounting that ensures equality of income tax revenue only if very clear now submerged.
Example number two: Additional personal income tax.
We move from the block of the possibility of changes in income tax rates to return the fiscal levers to increase the mayors, if they need the revenue. But if there is a reduction of allocations of State to the municipalities there is a tendency to use that leverage to maximum 0.4 per cent (with maximum increases of 0.2 percent per year). For citizens of the potential for an increase in weight of the personal income tax as a tribute to the fact that almost exclusively affects employees and retirees.
Example number three: Purpose and tourism fee.
tax residence and the scope are another lever on the municipalities, the tax holiday given to provincial capitals and the tourist is loaded on the price of each night, up to a maximum of five euro. The revenue that comes from must be used to finance expenses related to cultural heritage and this is useful, because tourists generate income but increases costs. The purpose of tax already existed, but was enlarged. Citizens tax themselves to explain that the tax is needed to build a bridge infrastructure.
Example number four: the IMU.
The municipal taxes only start from 2014. For the municipalities there is uncertainty that the new tax provides the same tax revenue it brings together. That is, 85 percent, the ICI on second homes and commercial properties. Change the rate, fixed at 0.76 percent, above the current level on average 0.5 percent. It becomes a tax on income in a sheet. This rate, according to the technical report, expected to generate equal revenue. For municipalities implies a limit on intervention rates, and less autonomy. For companies not realized the cancellation IRPEF: continue to pay for the buildings they use for their work. Affected the self-employed and businesses.
Example number five: Equalisation Fund.
should compensate for the different distribution of taxes between the various municipalities, to ensure the municipalities to finance the needs of their standard duties. That is for basic services such as childcare centers, local public transport, care for the elderly. The municipalities where there are many first homes, on which you do not pay any tax, will relatively little revenue.
(source: ilfattoquotidiano and other newspapers)
Federalism is a necessary reform. But without solidarity, and with this tax burden to the detriment of taxpayers, is simply a way to split even further our national community.
Example number one: the Coupon dry.
born on the taxation of income from property rented. For the taxpayer to step IRPEF dry with coupon rate of 19 or 21 is optional, you can choose the solution. The discount potential tax due is more relevant for taxpayers with a higher total income and is indifferent to the lowest incomes, will continue to choose the personal income tax. Municipalities now receive about 11 billion transfers. Now instead of transfers, there are charges paid and partnerships. Among them the coupon. But in the evaluation of accounting that ensures equality of income tax revenue only if very clear now submerged.
Example number two: Additional personal income tax.
We move from the block of the possibility of changes in income tax rates to return the fiscal levers to increase the mayors, if they need the revenue. But if there is a reduction of allocations of State to the municipalities there is a tendency to use that leverage to maximum 0.4 per cent (with maximum increases of 0.2 percent per year). For citizens of the potential for an increase in weight of the personal income tax as a tribute to the fact that almost exclusively affects employees and retirees.
Example number three: Purpose and tourism fee.
tax residence and the scope are another lever on the municipalities, the tax holiday given to provincial capitals and the tourist is loaded on the price of each night, up to a maximum of five euro. The revenue that comes from must be used to finance expenses related to cultural heritage and this is useful, because tourists generate income but increases costs. The purpose of tax already existed, but was enlarged. Citizens tax themselves to explain that the tax is needed to build a bridge infrastructure.
Example number four: the IMU.
The municipal taxes only start from 2014. For the municipalities there is uncertainty that the new tax provides the same tax revenue it brings together. That is, 85 percent, the ICI on second homes and commercial properties. Change the rate, fixed at 0.76 percent, above the current level on average 0.5 percent. It becomes a tax on income in a sheet. This rate, according to the technical report, expected to generate equal revenue. For municipalities implies a limit on intervention rates, and less autonomy. For companies not realized the cancellation IRPEF: continue to pay for the buildings they use for their work. Affected the self-employed and businesses.
Example number five: Equalisation Fund.
should compensate for the different distribution of taxes between the various municipalities, to ensure the municipalities to finance the needs of their standard duties. That is for basic services such as childcare centers, local public transport, care for the elderly. The municipalities where there are many first homes, on which you do not pay any tax, will relatively little revenue.
(source: ilfattoquotidiano and other newspapers)
Federalism is a necessary reform. But without solidarity, and with this tax burden to the detriment of taxpayers, is simply a way to split even further our national community.
0 comments:
Post a Comment